You are in free guest mode.
Timed Practice
Revision List
Attempt History
Progress Tracking
Create a free account to unlock these tools
Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers
ID: #873
Medium
Contemporary Writers
Transcript:
The earliest writers on politics - and I'm thinking of Plato and Aristotle here - felt free to draw insights from all areas of human knowledge, unlike modern academic writers who tend to put things into smaller and smaller compartments, or focus more closely on one area of enquiry. For example, Plato would examine a whole political system and the philosophy that underlies it, whereas modern writers on politics might concentrate on one particular institution in that system - the House of Lords in England - or on voting patterns within a country. With this focus the bigger questions that the ancients dealt with - "What is the best form of government?" or "What is justice?" -tend to get left behind. Many writers on politics these days are university-based and so have to have specialized interests, and while they may make new and interesting discoveries in their special field, it is at the loss of a broader perspective - not to mention the loss of a general audience or readership. In the 19"' century, there were still writers who used the same freedom of enquiry as the ancients, and are all the more readable - and relevant - because of it.
What reasons does the speaker gives about contemporary writers being less readable than ancient writers?
* Click on the correct answers
Result:
With a free account:
Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first!
No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...