Messenger - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Multiple Choice, Multiple Answers ID: #39024 Long Messenger

Instructions ›

Transcript:

I think it's important to recognize the messenger as well as the role that they're in because of the context they're in. So context is always king. If a woman goes into see her doctor, and the doctor runs a bunch of tests, and the doctor comes back and says, I'm sorry, Mrs. Smith, but I have to inform you that you have cancer. That's a fact. But that's a fact that comes with an enormous amount of weight, right, a enormous amount of emotional reaction to your concern, and perhaps motivation to do something about that. And then the doctor can follow up with a subsequent set of facts. And here are three different choices of you know, a prescription, it could be chemotherapy, could be something else that we want, that you need to know to are the options and that's informing the people of what those choices are. That seems to me a really nice example of what we think of as the prototypical scientists job in this issue is to inform the public inform policymakers, informed decision makers, here is the threat. Here's the danger that we face now with this thing called climate change. And moreover, let's not stop there, here are the range of potential solutions that can be done. That seems entirely appropriate. But the other thing to say here is that scientists are also citizens. And it is entirely okay and appropriate for a scientist to say, Okay, I'm going to wear a different hat now. And I'm going to speak as a citizen who happens to be a particularly informed citizen because I happen to study this issue.

Which of the following statements are correct according to the audio?

* Click on the correct answers

Context plays a crucial role in the communication of facts. Scientists should avoid discussing potential solutions to problems. A medical diagnosis is an example of a fact that comes with emotional weight. Scientists should not express their opinions as citizens. A scientist can be both an informed communicator of facts and an engaged citizen. Emotional reactions should always be avoided in communication.

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Option 1: "Context plays a crucial role in the communication of facts."
Explanation: The text emphasizes that 'context is always king,' indicating that understanding the context in which facts are presented is essential for effective communication. This aligns with the main idea that context influences how facts are perceived and understood.
Option 2: "Scientists should avoid discussing potential solutions to problems."
Explanation: This option contradicts the text, which states that scientists should inform the public about potential solutions to issues like climate change. The phrase 'here are the range of potential solutions' directly opposes the idea that scientists should avoid discussing solutions.
Option 3: "A medical diagnosis is an example of a fact that comes with emotional weight."
Explanation: The text provides a clear example of a medical diagnosis, stating that when a doctor informs a patient about cancer, it carries 'an enormous amount of emotional reaction.' This illustrates how certain facts, like medical diagnoses, are not just factual but also emotionally charged.
Option 4: "Scientists should not express their opinions as citizens."
Explanation: This option is incorrect as the text explicitly states that it is 'entirely okay and appropriate for a scientist to say' something as a citizen. This indicates that scientists can and should express their opinions, especially when they are informed about the issues.
Option 5: "A scientist can be both an informed communicator of facts and an engaged citizen."
Explanation: The text supports this option by stating that scientists can wear 'different hats' and act as informed citizens. This dual role is highlighted as appropriate, reinforcing the idea that scientists can communicate facts while also engaging in civic discourse.
Option 6: "Emotional reactions should always be avoided in communication."
Explanation: This option is incorrect because the text suggests that emotional reactions are a natural part of communicating facts, especially in sensitive situations like medical diagnoses. The emphasis is on recognizing and addressing these emotional responses rather than avoiding them.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Saving...