Antarctica - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #45384 Long Antarctica

Instructions ›

Transcript:

I do think that this is about creating a whole narrative. So there are some things that we absolutely know. And we can observe, and for some people, that is the most compelling thing. So for example, one thing that I always start off my scientific presentations on is a description of the ice cores that we drill in Antarctica, because what happens is that the air gets trapped in the snow as it falls. And then that means when we drill down through the ice, you can recover the actual air that was in the atmosphere, up to a million or so years ago in the past, and we can analyze it. So that's actual data. And and through that, we can see how the climate has naturally changed over hundreds of thousands of years. And that's a question that I often used to get asked. People used to say, well, hasn't the climate always changed? And it has! But we can also see how different that the levels of carbon dioxide in the past were compared to today's levels. And to demonstrate that today's climate change is vastly outside the natural cycle of change. So I think it's those sorts of things. And if I'm able to actually take samples of ice cores, into public audiences, and if people are actually able to hold the bits of ice core themselves and listen to the bubbles burst and the ice, then somehow they find that even more compelling because they've had that personal interaction with the evidence base. So I think some of those aspects are really important for grounding and building up a sense of trust. People are used to, you know, trusting things based on their own intuition and experiences. So if you can give people a sense of that, then I feel that they are more likely to take on trust the things that they don't have the ability to be able to actually test for themselves.

* Click on the correct answer

The passage emphasizes how presenting tangible evidence, such as ice cores from Antarctica, helps audiences understand and trust scientific data. By allowing people to interact with the physical evidence, the speaker builds a more personal connection with the data, which makes the reality of climate change more compelling. The passage highlights how scientific presentations can influence public opinion by focusing on historical climate patterns. It underscores the importance of showing how past climate data, derived from ice cores, proves that the Earth's climate has always changed naturally over time. The speaker explains how ice cores from Antarctica contain ancient air that provides data about the Earth's past climate. While acknowledging that the climate has always changed, the speaker focuses on the significant difference between natural climate change cycles and current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The passage discusses the importance of building trust with the public by using intuition and experience. It explains how audiences respond better to scientific data when they can connect it to something tangible, like holding ice cores and hearing the air bubbles, which helps make the case for climate change.

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Option 1: "The passage emphasizes how presenting tangible evidence, such as ice cores from Antarctica, helps audiences understand and trust scientific data. By allowing people to interact with the physical evidence, the speaker builds a more personal connection with the data, which makes the reality of climate change more compelling."
Explanation: This option accurately captures the main idea of the text, which is about the importance of presenting tangible evidence, like ice cores, to foster understanding and trust in scientific data. The speaker discusses how personal interaction with the evidence enhances the audience's connection to the data, making the issue of climate change more compelling. The use of phrases like 'tangible evidence' and 'personal connection' aligns well with the text's emphasis on these aspects.
Option 2: "The passage highlights how scientific presentations can influence public opinion by focusing on historical climate patterns. It underscores the importance of showing how past climate data, derived from ice cores, proves that the Earth's climate has always changed naturally over time."
Explanation: This option misrepresents the text by suggesting that the focus is solely on historical climate patterns and the natural changes over time. While the speaker acknowledges that the climate has always changed, the primary emphasis is on how presenting ice cores can help build trust and understanding regarding current climate change, rather than merely influencing public opinion about historical patterns.
Option 3: "The speaker explains how ice cores from Antarctica contain ancient air that provides data about the Earth's past climate. While acknowledging that the climate has always changed, the speaker focuses on the significant difference between natural climate change cycles and current levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere."
Explanation: This option correctly identifies the presence of ice cores and their significance in understanding past climate data. However, it fails to capture the main theme of the text, which is about the importance of personal interaction with the evidence to build trust and understanding. The focus on the difference in carbon dioxide levels is too narrow and does not encompass the broader narrative about engaging the audience.
Option 4: "The passage discusses the importance of building trust with the public by using intuition and experience. It explains how audiences respond better to scientific data when they can connect it to something tangible, like holding ice cores and hearing the air bubbles, which helps make the case for climate change."
Explanation: While this option touches on the idea of building trust and the importance of tangible connections, it does not fully encapsulate the main idea of the text. The emphasis on intuition and experience is secondary to the primary focus on how presenting tangible evidence, such as ice cores, enhances understanding and trust in scientific data. The option lacks the depth of the speaker's argument regarding the compelling nature of personal interaction with the evidence.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.

Saving...