Person - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #3947 Medium Person

Instructions ›

Transcript:

Ernest Hemingway was famously masculine. We can see this in the topics he wrote about: all those fights and bullfights, all those wars, all that hunting and fishing. All this, it is thought, was overdoing it and must point to some deep insecurity in the man. Perhaps he felt that the conventional image of a writer as a person who doesn't do a lot more than sitting at a desk, not visibly contributing much socially or economically to society as a whole was unmanly and carried a certain amount of guilt and shame with it?
During the First World War, he was badly wounded, hospitalized, and fell in love with a nurse. He wrote a novel about a man who was badly wounded in the First World War, was hospitalised and who fell in love with a nurse. The Spanish Civil War and the Second World War followed as did books about his experiences in them. Now, how much can we draw on a writer's biography to explain his work? It should, l believe, be irrelevant to the judgement you bring to the merits of the individual work.
Biographies of writers can be fascinating, especially if they lived as hard and fast as Hemingway, but, unfortunately, these days many people prefer the biography to the actual work. It is odd that the very reason a person would want to read a biography of a writer - that the subject has achieved fame and distinction in his field - should be the excuse for not reading his works.

* Click on the correct answer

The main point is to question whether the biographical facts of a writer's life are of any importance in evaluating his work. Hemingway is the example used here, and there does seem to be a direct connection between the events of his life and those in his books, but knowing this should not get in the way of a true critical judgement of the works. The writer Ernest Hemingway had a particularly eventful and exciting life and a lot of his real-life experiences got into his books. The speaker thinks this is irrelevant and doesn't believe that having lived such a full life makes the books any better, but he regrets that people now would prefer to read the biographies of writers rather than the books they wrote. It is difficult to tell whether the speaker approves of Hemingway's lifestyle or not. He was famously macho and spent a lot of time hunting wild animals, going to wars and getting into fights. All these things got into his books, and the speaker thinks that this is not necessarily a good thing as it means that too many people prefer to read about his life than read his books.

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Option 1: "The main point is to question whether the biographical facts of a writer's life are of any importance in evaluating his work. Hemingway is the example used here, and there does seem to be a direct connection between the events of his life and those in his books, but knowing this should not get in the way of a true critical judgement of the works."
Explanation: This option accurately captures the main idea of the text, which questions the relevance of a writer's biography in evaluating their work. The text discusses Hemingway's life and how it relates to his writing, but ultimately argues that this connection should not influence critical judgment. The phrase 'should not get in the way of a true critical judgement' reflects the author's stance on maintaining objectivity in literary evaluation.
Option 2: "The writer Ernest Hemingway had a particularly eventful and exciting life and a lot of his real-life experiences got into his books. The speaker thinks this is irrelevant and doesn't believe that having lived such a full life makes the books any better, but he regrets that people now would prefer to read the biographies of writers rather than the books they wrote."
Explanation: While this option mentions Hemingway's eventful life and the connection to his books, it misrepresents the author's main argument. The text does not explicitly state that the speaker thinks Hemingway's life is irrelevant; rather, it emphasizes that biographical details should not overshadow the evaluation of his works. Additionally, the regret about people preferring biographies is mentioned but is not the central focus of the text.
Option 3: "It is difficult to tell whether the speaker approves of Hemingway's lifestyle or not. He was famously macho and spent a lot of time hunting wild animals, going to wars and getting into fights. All these things got into his books, and the speaker thinks that this is not necessarily a good thing as it means that too many people prefer to read about his life than read his books."
Explanation: This option incorrectly suggests ambiguity in the speaker's approval of Hemingway's lifestyle, which is not a focus of the text. The text discusses Hemingway's masculinity and experiences but does not imply that the speaker has a negative view of them. Furthermore, it does not accurately reflect the main argument about the importance of biography in evaluating literary works, which is the core theme of the text.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.

Saving...