Traffic congestion - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #37567 Medium Traffic congestion

Instructions ›

Transcript:

Traffic congestion in Britain could be eased if it weren't for the nation's addiction to the absurd cult of the lone driver. But let's face it, sharing cars is something the British just don't do. Next Monday morning the streets will be overflowing with cars once again, most with spare seats front and back, and there will be few lifts on offer for those friends or colleagues who have no choice but to trudge through fumes or jostle in bus queues. Many drivers, it seems, echo the view of one former transport minister who observed, albeit light-heartedly, that with cars 'you have your own company, your own temperature control and your own choice of music — and you don't have to put up with dreadful human beings sitting alongside you.' Many a true word, it seems, is said in jest. Indeed, sharing would threaten the very independence that makes the car such an attractive option in the first place. Offer a colleague a regular lift and you're locked into a routine as oppressive as any other, with all individual flexibility lost. So, what's in it for the driver? But even in a motor-obsessed city such as Los Angeles, drivers have been won over by the idea of car-sharing. It is attractive because cars with more than one occupant are allowed access to fast-moving priority lanes. So desirable are these amid the six lanes of jam-packed traffic that, in the early days, Californian students charged motorists several dollars a time to pick them up.

* Click on the correct answer

Traffic congestion in Britain is primarily caused by the nation's addiction to the cult of the lone driver, which the passage argues needs to change. Despite the convenience and environmental benefits of carpooling, British drivers are resistant to the idea of sharing their cars with others. The passage suggests that the desire for personal space and control over their driving experience leads drivers to reject carpooling. It also mentions the success of car-sharing programs in Los Angeles due to the use of priority lanes. The main problem contributing to traffic congestion in Britain is the cultural preference for single-occupancy driving, which the passage refers to as the cult of the lone driver. While carpooling could alleviate this issue, it is uncommon in Britain because many drivers value the independence and privacy that driving alone provides. The passage briefly mentions that car-sharing programs in Los Angeles have gained popularity due to the access to priority lanes. The passage discusses the issue of traffic congestion in Britain and attributes it to the nation's strong attachment to single-occupancy car use, referred to as the cult of the lone driver. The passage argues that sharing rides could alleviate this problem, but many British drivers resist the idea because they cherish the independence and privacy of solo driving. Additionally, the passage notes the success of car-sharing programs in Los Angeles, which grant access to priority lanes. Traffic congestion in United Kingdom is intensified by a strong preference for single-occupancy car use, as ride-sharing remains relatively uncommon. The passage argues that this “cult of the lone driver” is a key contributor to gridlock. Although carpooling offers clear benefits, many motorists prioritize the independence and privacy of driving alone. It also notes that car-sharing initiatives have seen success in cities such as Los Angeles, where participants are granted access to priority lanes.

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Option 1: "Traffic congestion in Britain is primarily caused by the nation's addiction to the cult of the lone driver, which the passage argues needs to change. Despite the convenience and environmental benefits of carpooling, British drivers are resistant to the idea of sharing their cars with others. The passage suggests that the desire for personal space and control over their driving experience leads drivers to reject carpooling. It also mentions the success of car-sharing programs in Los Angeles due to the use of priority lanes."
Explanation: This option incorrectly states that the passage argues the need for change regarding the cult of the lone driver, which is not explicitly mentioned. While it captures the idea of resistance to carpooling, it overemphasizes the convenience and environmental benefits without accurately reflecting the text's focus on independence and privacy. Additionally, it implies a stronger advocacy for change than what the text conveys.
Option 2: "The main problem contributing to traffic congestion in Britain is the cultural preference for single-occupancy driving, which the passage refers to as the cult of the lone driver. While carpooling could alleviate this issue, it is uncommon in Britain because many drivers value the independence and privacy that driving alone provides. The passage briefly mentions that car-sharing programs in Los Angeles have gained popularity due to the access to priority lanes."
Explanation: This option presents a correct identification of the cultural preference for single-occupancy driving but fails to capture the text's emphasis on the psychological aspects of independence and privacy. It also inaccurately suggests that the passage briefly mentions Los Angeles car-sharing programs, whereas it provides a more detailed discussion. The phrase 'gained popularity' is misleading as it does not reflect the text's focus on the specific benefits of priority lanes.
Option 3: "The passage discusses the issue of traffic congestion in Britain and attributes it to the nation's strong attachment to single-occupancy car use, referred to as the cult of the lone driver. The passage argues that sharing rides could alleviate this problem, but many British drivers resist the idea because they cherish the independence and privacy of solo driving. Additionally, the passage notes the success of car-sharing programs in Los Angeles, which grant access to priority lanes."
Explanation: While this option accurately identifies the attachment to single-occupancy car use and the resistance to sharing rides, it does not fully encapsulate the text's argument about the 'cult of the lone driver' as a key contributor to congestion. The phrase 'cherish the independence and privacy' is somewhat vague and does not reflect the text's more nuanced discussion of the psychological barriers to carpooling. Furthermore, it does not emphasize the cultural context as strongly as the correct option.
Option 4: "Traffic congestion in United Kingdom is intensified by a strong preference for single-occupancy car use, as ride-sharing remains relatively uncommon. The passage argues that this “cult of the lone driver” is a key contributor to gridlock. Although carpooling offers clear benefits, many motorists prioritize the independence and privacy of driving alone. It also notes that car-sharing initiatives have seen success in cities such as Los Angeles, where participants are granted access to priority lanes."
Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main ideas of the passage. It identifies the 'cult of the lone driver' as a key contributor to traffic congestion, reflecting the text's thesis. The mention of independence and privacy aligns with the text's argument about why drivers resist carpooling. Furthermore, it correctly notes the success of car-sharing initiatives in Los Angeles and the benefits of priority lanes, providing a comprehensive overview of the text's content.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Saving...