Affordable Care Act - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Listening: Highlight Correct Summary ID: #35271 Medium Affordable Care Act

Instructions ›

Transcript:

Before the Affordable Care Act came along, 80% of Americans had quality health insurance, like my wife and I, through their employer or through government programs like Medicare or Medicaid. For some, this insurance was far from ideal, as it featured high costs and a limited choice of providers. But overall, this was substantive coverage which enrollees were by and large satisfied. On the other hand, the other 20% of Americans were either uninsured or faced the prospect of buying insurance in the unstable and discriminatory non-group insurance market. This is a market where it was totally legal for insurers to discriminate against the sick for any reason. Insurers could deny the sick coverage; they could charge them much more than the healthy for insurance or they could exclude their pre-existing illnesses from coverage. As a result, if you were healthy, you could get health insurance. This defeats the whole notion of health insurance. Health insurance is supposed to protect you against financial risk, not protect your insurance company against the sick. And as a result, people in this market were just one bad gene or one bad accident away from bankruptcy.

* Click on the correct answer

Previously, most Americans were uninsured because health insurance was a relatively new concept. Then more and more people started to realize the importance of quality health insurance. Insurance companies, therefore, offered more products that matched their customers. 20% of Americans were either uninsured or faced the prospect of buying insurance in the unstable insurance market. Because they could not prove their financial capability, no insurance companies would provide good insurance for them. Health insurance in America is not fair for everyone. Its aim should be protecting people against financial risk, instead of protecting their insurance company against the sick. If things go on the wrong track, people in this market would be very close to bankruptcy. The insurance market is one where it was totally legal for insurers to discriminate against the sick for any reason. Insurers only provide basic insurance for Americans, but if people get a wrong gene or get caught in a bad traffic accident, they will no longer provide the service anymore.

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Option 1: "Previously, most Americans were uninsured because health insurance was a relatively new concept. Then more and more people started to realize the importance of quality health insurance. Insurance companies, therefore, offered more products that matched their customers."
Explanation: This option incorrectly states that most Americans were uninsured, which contradicts the text that mentions 80% had quality insurance. It also misrepresents the timeline and the role of insurance companies, suggesting a proactive approach that is not supported by the text.
Option 2: "20% of Americans were either uninsured or faced the prospect of buying insurance in the unstable insurance market. Because they could not prove their financial capability, no insurance companies would provide good insurance for them."
Explanation: While this option correctly identifies the 20% of Americans facing issues with insurance, it inaccurately attributes their lack of coverage to an inability to prove financial capability. The text emphasizes discrimination against the sick rather than financial proof as the main issue.
Option 3: "Health insurance in America is not fair for everyone. Its aim should be protecting people against financial risk, instead of protecting their insurance company against the sick. If things go on the wrong track, people in this market would be very close to bankruptcy."
Explanation: This option accurately summarizes the main idea of the text, which critiques the unfairness of the health insurance system and emphasizes that its purpose should be to protect individuals from financial risk. It reflects the author's concern about the potential for bankruptcy due to the current discriminatory practices in the insurance market.
Option 4: "The insurance market is one where it was totally legal for insurers to discriminate against the sick for any reason. Insurers only provide basic insurance for Americans, but if people get a wrong gene or get caught in a bad traffic accident, they will no longer provide the service anymore."
Explanation: This option correctly mentions the legality of discrimination in the insurance market but misrepresents the nature of the coverage provided. The text discusses substantive coverage for the majority, not just basic insurance, and does not imply that insurers would stop providing service entirely based on genetic or accident-related factors.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.

Saving...