Paris - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Reading: Fill in The Blanks (Drag & Drop) ID: #50300 July Prediction Paris

Instructions ›

* Drag the correct answer into all target fields

Paris is very old — there has been a settlement there for at least 6,000 years and its shape has been determined in by the River Seine, and in part by the edicts of France' s rulers. But the great boulevards we admire today are relatively new, and were constructed to prevent any more barricades being by the rebellious population; that work was carried out in the middle 19th century. The earlier Paris had been in part a maze of narrow streets and alleyways. But you can imagine that the work was not only highly expensive, but caused great distress among the half a million or so whose houses were razed, and whose neighborhoods disappeared. What is done cannot usually be undone, especially when buildings are torn .

at only creating random created been down up simply part

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Correct answer: part
Explanation: The word 'part' fits grammatically as it serves as a noun indicating a portion of the influence on Paris's shape. The phrase 'in part' is a common expression used to indicate that something is true to some extent, which aligns with the context of how the River Seine and rulers influenced the city's shape.
Meaning: 'Part' refers to a portion or segment of something, indicating that the River Seine and rulers contributed to the city's shape.
Wrong options:
only: The word 'only' is an adverb that indicates exclusivity, which does not fit the context of describing how the shape was influenced.
at: The preposition 'at' does not grammatically fit in this context, as it does not convey the idea of contribution to the shape.
random: The word 'random' is an adjective that implies lack of order or purpose, which does not apply to the structured influence on the city's shape.
down: The word 'down' is an adverb that does not fit the context of describing influence and does not relate to the shape of Paris.
up: The word 'up' is an adverb that does not convey the intended meaning of contribution to the shape.
creating: The gerund 'creating' does not fit grammatically as it does not serve as a noun in this context.
been: The word 'been' is a past participle that does not fit as it does not serve as a noun or indicate a portion.
Correct answer: created
Explanation: The verb 'created' fits grammatically as it is in the past participle form, which is appropriate for the passive construction 'being created.' This aligns with the context of barricades being made by the population, indicating an action that was done to them.
Meaning: 'Created' refers to the act of bringing something into existence, in this case, barricades by the population.
Wrong options:
only: The adverb 'only' does not fit as it does not relate to the action of making barricades.
part: The noun 'part' does not fit grammatically in this context as it does not describe an action.
random: The adjective 'random' does not apply to the context of creating barricades, as it implies lack of order.
down: The adverb 'down' does not relate to the action of creating barricades and does not fit grammatically.
up: The adverb 'up' does not convey the intended meaning of making barricades.
simply: The adverb 'simply' does not fit as it does not describe an action and is not in the correct form for this context.
been: The past participle 'been' does not fit as it does not describe an action related to barricades.
Correct answer: simply
Explanation: The adverb 'simply' fits grammatically as it modifies the verb 'razed,' indicating the manner in which the houses were destroyed. It conveys that the action was straightforward and without complication, which aligns with the context of the demolition of houses.
Meaning: 'Simply' means in a straightforward or uncomplicated manner, indicating that the razing of houses was done without complexity.
Wrong options:
only: The adverb 'only' does not fit as it does not describe the manner of razing and implies exclusivity, which is not relevant here.
part: The noun 'part' does not fit grammatically as it does not modify the verb 'razed.'
random: The adjective 'random' does not apply to the context of razing houses, as it implies lack of order or purpose.
down: The adverb 'down' does not relate to the manner of razing and does not fit grammatically.
up: The adverb 'up' does not convey the intended meaning of how the houses were razed.
created: The past participle 'created' does not fit as it does not describe the manner of razing houses.
been: The past participle 'been' does not fit as it does not modify the verb 'razed'.
Correct answer: down
Explanation: The adverb 'down' fits grammatically as it is commonly used in the phrase 'torn down,' which indicates the action of demolishing buildings. This aligns with the context of buildings being destroyed.
Meaning: 'Down' in this context means to demolish or destroy, particularly in reference to buildings.
Wrong options:
only: The adverb 'only' does not fit as it does not describe the action of tearing down buildings.
part: The noun 'part' does not fit grammatically as it does not relate to the action of demolition.
random: The adjective 'random' does not apply to the context of tearing down buildings, as it implies lack of order or purpose.
creating: The gerund 'creating' does not fit as it does not describe the action of tearing down buildings.
up: The adverb 'up' does not convey the intended meaning of demolishing and does not fit grammatically.
simply: The adverb 'simply' does not relate to the action of tearing down and does not fit in this context.
been: The past participle 'been' does not fit as it does not describe the action of tearing down.

PoS Classification

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

How difficult was this question?

Others found: 50% Easy · 0% Medium · 50% Hard

Saving...