South Atlantic - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Reading: Fill in The Blanks (Drag & Drop) ID: #46940 South Atlantic

Instructions ›

In the text below some words are missing. Drag words from the box below to the appropriate place in the text. To undo an answer choice, drag the word back to the box below the text.

* Drag the correct answer into all target fields

This group of small and relatively unknown islands be found in the South Atlantic Ocean about 300 miles from the Argentinian coast and roughly 750 miles from Antarctica. The two main islands are called east and west Falkand, with more than 700 hundred smaller islands making the archipelago, totalling 4,700 square miles. Most of is baron grassland that is unusable for farming crops due to the wet weather resulting in boggy unstable ground.

up could in where which can

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Correct answer: can
Explanation: The word 'can' is a modal verb that indicates possibility or ability. In this context, it fits grammatically as it suggests that the islands have the ability to be found in the specified location, maintaining the sentence's structure and meaning.
Meaning: 'Can' expresses the ability or possibility of something happening.
Wrong options:
could: The word 'could' is also a modal verb indicating possibility, but it implies a past ability or a hypothetical situation, which does not fit the present context of finding the islands.
up: The word 'up' is a preposition or adverb that does not fit grammatically in this context, as it does not convey the ability to find the islands.
where: The word 'where' is an adverb that introduces a clause indicating location, but it does not fit as it does not express ability or possibility in this sentence.
in: The word 'in' is a preposition that indicates location but does not convey the ability to find the islands, making it grammatically incorrect in this context.
which: The word 'which' is a pronoun used to introduce a relative clause, but it does not fit here as it does not express ability or possibility.
Correct answer: up
Explanation: The word 'up' is used here as a preposition that indicates the total number of smaller islands contributing to the archipelago. It fits grammatically and contextually, as it describes the composition of the islands.
Meaning: 'Up' in this context means to total or to add together, indicating the smaller islands contribute to the overall count of the archipelago.
Wrong options:
can: The word 'can' is a modal verb indicating ability or possibility, which does not fit the context of describing the composition of the archipelago.
which: The word 'which' is a pronoun that introduces a relative clause, but it does not fit here as it does not describe the total number of islands.
where: The word 'where' is an adverb that indicates location, which does not fit in this context of totaling islands.
could: The word 'could' is a modal verb indicating past ability or hypothetical situations, which does not apply to the current context of counting islands.
in: The word 'in' is a preposition that indicates location but does not convey the idea of totaling or counting the islands.
Correct answer: which
Explanation: The word 'which' is a relative pronoun that introduces a clause providing additional information about the grassland. It fits grammatically as it connects the clause to the subject, maintaining coherence in the sentence.
Meaning: 'Which' is used to refer to a specific thing or group previously mentioned, in this case, the grassland.
Wrong options:
can: The word 'can' is a modal verb indicating ability or possibility, which does not fit as it does not relate to the description of the grassland.
up: The word 'up' is a preposition or adverb that does not fit grammatically in this context, as it does not provide additional information about the grassland.
where: The word 'where' is an adverb that indicates location, which does not fit as it does not provide a descriptive clause about the grassland.
could: The word 'could' is a modal verb indicating past ability or hypothetical situations, which does not apply to the context of describing the grassland.
in: The word 'in' is a preposition that indicates location but does not serve to introduce a descriptive clause about the grassland.

PoS Classification

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

How difficult was this question?

Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard

Saving...