Vehicle - Marvel Education

Loading question...

You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools

Prev Next

Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #46868 Vehicle

Instructions ›

Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.

* Select the correct answer into all dropdown fields. You need to answer all questions before clicking verify button.

A chariot is a two-wheeled vehicle pulled by a horse. The chariot was the first true fighting vehicle. Ancient armies it to transport archers and other troops to the battlefield, they would disembark and fight. The Assyrians, whose archers and spearmen fought from inside the chariot itself, turned the vehicle a fearsome offensive weapon. So enemies were able to resist an attack of Assyrian chariots. This form of attack was soon adopted by many of the Assyrian's enemies, who used the chariot against them with good effect.

Result:

A.I. Explanation:

Correct answer: used
Explanation: The word 'used' is the simple past tense of the verb 'use,' which is appropriate here as it indicates a completed action in the past. The context of the sentence refers to ancient armies, which aligns with the past tense required to describe their historical actions.
Meaning: 'Used' means that something was employed or utilized in the past, indicating that ancient armies actively employed chariots for transportation during battles.
Wrong options:
have used: This is present perfect tense, which implies an action that has relevance to the present, not fitting the historical context of the sentence.
was using: This is past continuous tense, suggesting an ongoing action in the past, which does not align with the completed action of armies employing chariots.
were used: This passive form suggests that chariots were utilized by someone, but it lacks the active voice needed to convey that armies actively employed them.
have been used: This present perfect passive form indicates an ongoing relevance to the present, which does not suit the historical context of the sentence.
Correct answer: where
Explanation: The word 'where' is a relative adverb that introduces a clause providing information about a place. It fits grammatically and contextually as it refers to the location where the troops disembarked to fight.
Meaning: 'Where' refers to a place or location, indicating the battlefield as the site of action for the troops.
Wrong options:
which: This is a relative pronoun typically used for things, not places, making it unsuitable in this context.
whom: This is a relative pronoun used for people, which does not fit as the subject of the clause refers to a place, not individuals.
that: While 'that' can refer to places, it is less specific than 'where' and does not convey the same clarity regarding location in this context.
when: This refers to time, not place, making it irrelevant to the context of disembarking on the battlefield.
Correct answer: into
Explanation: The word 'into' is a preposition indicating movement toward the inside of something. It fits grammatically and contextually as it describes how the Assyrians transformed the chariot into a weapon.
Meaning: 'Into' means to move from outside to a point inside, indicating the transformation of the chariot into a weapon.
Wrong options:
onto: This implies movement toward a surface, which does not fit the context of transforming the chariot into a weapon.
to: This indicates direction but lacks the implication of entering or becoming part of something, which is necessary here.
against: This suggests opposition rather than transformation, making it unsuitable in this context.
towards: This indicates direction but does not imply entering or becoming part of something, which is essential for the intended meaning.
Correct answer: few
Explanation: The word 'few' is a quantifier that indicates a small number. It fits grammatically and contextually as it describes the limited number of enemies able to resist the Assyrian chariots.
Meaning: 'Few' means not many, indicating that only a small number of enemies could withstand the attacks.
Wrong options:
many: This implies a large number, which contradicts the context of the sentence that emphasizes the rarity of successful resistance.
little: This is used for uncountable nouns, making it grammatically incorrect here as it refers to countable enemies.
most: This implies the majority, which is contrary to the intended meaning of only a small number being able to resist.
a little: This refers to a small amount of uncountable nouns, which does not apply to the countable noun 'enemies'.
Correct answer: devastating
Explanation: The word 'devastating' is an adjective that describes something causing severe shock or distress. It fits grammatically and contextually as it characterizes the form of attack as highly destructive.
Meaning: 'Devastating' means causing great damage or destruction, indicating the effectiveness of the attack by Assyrian chariots.
Wrong options:
boring: This means uninteresting, which is the opposite of the intended meaning and does not fit the context of an effective attack.
tiring: This implies exhaustion, which does not relate to the impact of the attack and is irrelevant in this context.
charming: This suggests something delightful, which is contrary to the destructive nature of the attack being described.
wondering: This is a verb form that does not fit as an adjective to describe the form of attack.

PoS Classification

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.

How difficult was this question?

Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard

Saving...