Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63245 Medium Open Banking Needs a Start Date

Read the following editorial from a website.

Canadians who want to compare their bank fees with a rival’s offer still have to hand their online banking password to an app and hope for the best. Ottawa has promised open banking for years, and its latest draft rules would finally require banks to share customer data, with the customer’s permission, through secure connections. We believe these rules are overdue, and we think a firm start date must be part of them.

Imelda Johal, who leads a group of financial technology firms, told a Senate committee that password sharing is the real danger today. “Every week we wait, millions of people keep handing strangers the keys to their accounts,” she said. Johal argues that customers should also get one screen where they can switch off any app’s access. The big banks see it differently. Harold Marinescu, a security executive at one of them, warns that a rushed deadline would open new doors for fraudsters before anyone has settled who repays a customer when stolen data is misused. “Convenience is easy to advertise; a clear refund rule is harder to write,” Marinescu said. We take this concern seriously, but we also note that the banks have raised it for the better part of a decade.

Smaller lenders face a different problem. Greta Pemberton, who manages technology for a credit union in Saskatchewan, says her team of six cannot build new systems as fast as a national bank with hundreds of engineers. “Give us the money and a little more time, and we will get there,” she said. Consumer advocate Owen Nyberg adds that the public should be able to see how often breaches happen and how quickly revoked access actually stops.

We urge Ottawa to set a firm start date, to write the fraud refund rule into the regulations before that date, and to give credit unions both funding and an extra year. Another open-ended delay would help nobody. Our readers deserve safer tools, and our banks deserve clear rules. A deadline can give us both.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly believes that the current way of linking apps already puts customers at risk? 2.
.

Harold Marinescu’s position would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Greta Pemberton’s request call for? 4.
.

The editorial’s attitude toward the banks’ security objections is best described as 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

Who else here has typed a bank password into a budgeting app this month? I did it on Sunday for my shop’s books, so Nyberg’s wish to publish 6.
caught my eye, though I wonder how many shoppers would ever read it. The fintech group’s leader also says customers should get 7.
, and I would use that from the very first day. My own credit union sits in a small prairie town, and I have banked there since my first job at sixteen. So I listened closely when Pemberton said 8.
, and I hope Ottawa listens too. Over lunch last week, a friend who runs a bakery agreed with Marinescu’s claim that 9.
, and she usually trusts new technology more than I do. I’m glad the paper says our banks deserve 10.
, though I doubt the banks themselves will see it that way.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...