Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63240 Medium Four Old Windows and a Strict Rulebook

Read the following blog post from a website.

My narrow brick house in our city’s oldest heritage district was built in 1889, and its four front windows are the originals. Every January I wipe water from the sills before breakfast. Last fall I applied to replace them with double-glazed units, and I quickly learned how strict the district rules are: owners must copy the old windows almost exactly, down to the thin wooden bars between the panes. Now city council is asking whether those rules should bend when a new window would save real energy, so I have spent a month asking questions.

Birgit Arvidson, a building scientist who tests older homes, argues that council should allow modern glass as long as the frame looks right from the street. Her thermal photos of designated houses show heat escaping around original frames, and she told council that damp sills are rotting in the very homes the rules were written to protect. Horatio Blanchette, one of a handful of local carpenters who still rebuild wooden sashes by hand, says most old windows can be repaired, sealed and backed by storm panels fitted on the inside. In his view, plastic copies would strip the district of the handwork it was listed for. “A window that has lasted this long deserves a repair before a burial,” he told me when I called his shop.

Priyanka Coutts, who leads sustainability planning for the city, says she is open to flexible permits, just not yet. She asks the city to publish a comparison between the carbon already stored in old frames and the carbon a new window would save, together with design guidelines for each street, before any general exemption is approved. Malachi Dorval, who chairs the district’s homeowners’ association, insists that fairness matters most. He wants an energy audit before and after the work on every approved window, with photos filed where anyone can see them, so that owners on different blocks are treated the same way.

I started this process sure that all four windows had to go. After an hour on the phone with Blanchette, I am far less sure. This spring I will have him look at the two worst windows and add storm panels, and I will keep my replacement application ready in case the sills still drip next winter. I still believe council should allow matched replacements in the end, but only once Coutts has her carbon numbers and Dorval has his audits.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This blog post is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly believes that most old windows can be fixed rather than replaced? 2.
.

Birgit Arvidson’s position would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Priyanka Coutts’s condition call for? 4.
.

How has the blogger’s own plan changed by the end of the blog post? 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

Our semi-detached house is only two streets over from yours, and I could easily have written your first paragraph myself. Last fall you applied to replace your front windows with 6.
, and I made the same request in October before learning how long the wait would be. Birgit Arvidson would allow modern glass as long as 7.
, and I think most neighbours could live with that. I had never heard of Priyanka Coutts, who 8.
, but her view on timing has stuck with me since. The association chair wants 9.
for every approval, so nobody on one block gets a special deal. Your house, which 10.
, has clearly earned some patience.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...