Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63222 Medium Data Centres at the Door

Read the following editorial from a website.

Three companies have applied to build data centres near Selkirk and Brandon, and together they want as much electricity as about 300,000 homes. Our province should not turn them away. The jobs are real, and the cloud services they would run are used by businesses across our province. But we should not let them jump ahead of the hospitals, factories and families already waiting for power, and the offer of cheap, unlimited electricity that some officials are floating is the wrong way to begin.

Eloise Lefebvre, the province’s investment commissioner, argues that a campus willing to help pay for new wind turbines, solar panels or batteries, timed to its own demand, deserves a faster connection. “A large, steady customer can pull clean power forward, as long as it signs a firm deal,” she told the energy board, pointing to other provinces where shared spending on substations shortened the wait to connect. She also wants the waiting list for connections published so that towns can see who is ahead of them. Nasser Poulin, a planner at the provincial utility, warns that discounts with no conditions would push hospitals, factories and heat-pump programs further back in the queue. “If a campus switches on before the new line is ready, the dimming happens in somebody else’s kitchen,” he said. He wants backup capacity secured before any ground is broken.

Honora Grenier, mayor of a town of 6,000 near one proposed site, says her water plant was built for her residents, not for cooling servers. She would welcome a campus only if its water use and its payments in place of property taxes are released to the public ahead of the council vote on rezoning the land. Piers Faulkner, of a Winnipeg climate group, also wants Grenier’s numbers in public view. He adds that any company claiming green power should have to prove it comes from new sources, not from existing hydro dams that already serve the rest of us.

We believe the rules our province writes should borrow from all four. Campuses that pay for new clean power should get faster connections, as Lefebvre says, but only after Poulin’s backup capacity is secured. Water use and tax payments should be public before any rezoning vote, and green claims should pass Faulkner’s test. Above all, the utility board should hold a public hearing before it signs any contract. Our hospitals and homes were in line first, and they should stay there.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly warns that a campus might draw power before its new line is ready? 2.
.

Eloise Lefebvre’s position would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Honora Grenier’s condition call for? 4.
.

The editorial’s attitude toward the proposed data centres is best described as 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

I work nights in the emergency department at Selkirk, and this editorial was the first thing I opened after my shift this morning. The investment commissioner’s idea of 6.
is one I could support without much worry. Piers Faulkner is right that companies should 7.
, and he says it more clearly than anyone else in the piece. The mayor near one proposed site says her water plant 8.
, and I would ask the same question in her place. I did not know the three applications together would need 9.
. Most of all, I am glad you asked the utility board to hold 10.
, and I will be there if it happens.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...