Correct Answer: how buildings should manage visitor parking
Passage Reference: Several building boards are now debating whether to make guest permits easier to get or to protect the few overnight stalls for residents
Why this is correct: The editorial describes boards debating guest permits and overnight stalls, and it ends with advice on how to manage visitor parking.
Tips: Read the first paragraph for the debate, then the last paragraph for the advice. Ask what problem both paragraphs are about.
Why the other options are wrong:
- why condo fees keep rising across Toronto: Condo fees are never discussed. The subject is guest permits and parking stalls.
- whether guests should pay for street parking: Paying for street parking is not discussed. Guests idling on the street is only a sign of the paper book problem.
- how the subway could run later at night: The subway is mentioned only because Novak’s visitors arrive after it stops. Running it later is not the topic.
Correct Answer: Parveen Sidhu
Passage Reference: She warns that easier passes will take overnight stalls from residents first
Why this is correct: Sidhu warns that easier passes will take overnight stalls from residents first.
Tips: Read each speaker’s lines and look for the verb “warns”. Check what that person says will happen to residents.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Julia Beaulieu: Beaulieu wants easier digital passes, so she is not the one worried about residents losing stalls.
- Pablo Novak: Novak worries about his own late visitors being stranded, not about residents losing overnight stalls.
- Quentin Asante: Asante asks for weekly occupancy figures to be posted. The worry about losing stalls is first raised by Sidhu.
Correct Answer: fewer lobby complaints during the phone pass trial
Passage Reference: She reports that lobby complaints dropped during a trial of the phone pass
Why this is correct: Beaulieu supports the phone pass, and she reports that lobby complaints dropped during its trial, so that result supports her position.
Tips: First find what Beaulieu wants. Then look for a result she reports from something already tried.
Why the other options are wrong:
- a new monthly charge for each guest permit: No charge for guest permits is mentioned. Beaulieu wants passes to be easier to get, so a new fee would not support her.
- a survey showing residents prefer paper passes: No survey is mentioned, and residents preferring paper passes would argue against Beaulieu’s digital pass.
- reports of guests keeping stalls overnight: Guests keeping stalls overnight is the danger Sidhu warns about, so reports like this would weaken Beaulieu’s case, not support it.
Correct Answer: owners would lower the limits fast if residents lost spots
Passage Reference: so owners can lower the limits fast if residents begin losing their spots
Why this is correct: Asante wants weekly occupancy figures posted so that owners can lower the limits fast if residents begin losing their spots.
Tips: Asante’s lines have a “so” clause. Read what posting the figures would make possible.
Why the other options are wrong:
- guests would pay a weekly fee for each overnight stay: Asante never suggests a weekly fee for guests. The condition is about posting occupancy figures.
- the lobby would keep a paper book as a backup: Keeping a paper book as a backup is not Asante’s idea, and the editorial criticizes the paper book.
- tenants without cars would give up their stalls: Nobody in the editorial asks tenants without cars to give up their stalls.
Correct Answer: recommend a balanced set of parking rules
Passage Reference: We believe they can do both, but only if the new rules come with firm limits and honest numbers
Why this is correct: Near the start, the writers say boards can make passes easier and protect stalls at the same time. This works as long as the rules have firm limits and honest numbers. The last paragraph then lists a mix of rules for boards to adopt.
Tips: Purpose questions ask what the whole editorial sets out to do. Compare each choice with the writers’ view in the first paragraph and the list in the last one.
Why the other options are wrong:
- defend the paper book in the lobby: The second paragraph shows the paper book running out and leaving guests idling. So the writers criticize it and do not defend it.
- criticize residents who own two cars: Residents with two cars are never mentioned in the editorial.
- report the results of a board vote: No vote has happened. The boards are still debating, and the editorial gives advice.
Correct Answer: indoor spots are already full before midnight on weeknights
Passage Reference: she points out that indoor spots are already full before midnight on weeknights
Why this is correct: The detail the commenter recognizes is Sidhu’s point that indoor spots are already full before midnight on weeknights.
Tips: The commenter’s night guard knows this detail, so it is about the garage at night. Look for it in the chair’s lines in the third paragraph.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the outdoor lot is nearly empty after dark on weeknights: No outdoor lot is mentioned, and Sidhu says the indoor spots are full, not empty.
- guests seldom stay in the garage past midnight on weeknights: Nothing says guests leave before midnight. The point made about midnight is that indoor spots are already full.
- residents rent their spare indoor stalls to guests on weeknights: Renting spare stalls to guests is never mentioned in the editorial.
Correct Answer: rigid rules can leave late visitors stranded
Passage Reference: says his caregivers and relatives often arrive after the subway stops running, so rigid rules leave them stranded
Why this is correct: The tenant in the editorial is Novak. He says his caregivers and relatives arrive after the subway stops running, so rigid rules leave them stranded.
Tips: The comment calls him “the tenant”. Go back to his lines and find the problem his caregivers and relatives face.
Why the other options are wrong:
- caregivers should get their own reserved stalls: Novak never asks for reserved stalls for caregivers. His point is that rigid rules leave his late visitors stranded.
- a paper book is easier for older relatives to use: Novak likes the digital pass, so he does not argue for the paper book.
- guests who arrive late should pay a small fee: Novak never mentions any fee for late guests. He wants rules that do not leave them stranded.
Correct Answer: guests end up idling on the street by Friday
Passage Reference: By Friday the paper book in the lobby is empty, and guests end up idling on the street
Why this is correct: Beaulieu said that by Friday the paper book in the lobby is empty and guests end up idling on the street.
Tips: The comment names Beaulieu, so find her quote at the owners’ meeting. The blank matches the second half of it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- delivery vans block the garage ramp every morning: Beaulieu never talks about delivery vans or the garage ramp.
- residents argue over stalls beside the elevators: Beaulieu does not describe residents arguing over stalls. Her example is guests waiting on the street.
- visitors line up at the lobby desk after dinner: Beaulieu says the paper book runs out by Friday, not that visitors line up at the desk in the evening.
Correct Answer: the two-hour limit on daytime visits
Passage Reference: keep Beaulieu’s two-hour daytime cap
Why this is correct: In the last paragraph, the writers say boards ought to keep Beaulieu’s two-hour daytime cap. She wants this limit so that stalls keep turning over.
Tips: The blank asks what boards should keep. Look for the word “keep” in the last paragraph’s list.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the paper book as a backup in the lobby: The writers want boards to adopt the digital pass and they criticize the paper book. So they do not ask to keep the book.
- a weekly fee for every overnight guest: Charging overnight guests a weekly fee is never suggested.
- a ban on guests during weekday afternoons: Daytime guests are not banned. Their visits are limited to two hours.
Correct Answer: overnight guests need a stricter limit than daytime callers
Passage Reference: he agrees with Sidhu that guests staying the night should face a stricter limit than daytime callers
Why this is correct: Novak agrees with Sidhu that guests staying the night should face a stricter limit than daytime callers. He accepts this even though his own relatives arrive late. That is the point the commenter plans to repeat.
Tips: The tenant accepts a point that could hurt his own visitors. Look for “yet he agrees” in his lines.
Why the other options are wrong:
- guests should pay a fee for every overnight stay: Novak never accepts a fee for overnight stays. What he accepts is a stricter limit.
- evening visitors should use the street after ten o’clock: Novak wants help for late visitors, and nobody in the editorial sends evening visitors to the street.
- each unit should host only one guest a week: Novak never agrees to a weekly limit on guests for each unit. What he accepts is a stricter limit for guests staying the night.