Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63179 Easy Two Parks First for Free Wi-Fi

Read the following editorial from a website.

Last October, a reporter for our paper counted eleven students doing homework on their phones at the picnic tables in Exhibition Park after dark, most of them borrowing a weak signal from a nearby coffee shop. That scene explains why Guelph council is now considering free Wi-Fi for its major parks, and it persuaded us that the idea deserves a serious try. We think the plan is a good one, but we also think the city should learn to run it in two parks before it promises it in twenty.

Viola Drummond, the parks planner behind the proposal, told council that comment cards collected last summer show homework use clustering around playgrounds and picnic shelters in the evening. In her view, routers and locked equipment boxes would cost less than keeping every library branch open longer. Her plan also includes a shared outage checklist and a weekly map of signal strength posted online. Seamus Lozano, an analyst in the city’s IT department, is not convinced by her numbers. He says stolen equipment and cold-weather failures could wipe out those savings, particularly where the power lines in a park are old and weak. “Wi-Fi stops being free when a crew replaces the hardware every month,” he said. He wants a pilot in two parks, public uptime figures and a set budget for replacement parts.

Ramona Bhullar, a settlement worker who helps newcomer teenagers, says many of the families she meets have no reliable internet at home, so a park signal is closer to a public service than a luxury. She supports Drummond’s goal, but she wants theft-resistant mounts installed before coverage spreads beyond the first sites. Councillor Cedric Voss points out that park crews are already stretched in winter, clearing paths and repairing play equipment. He will support a pilot only if an outage dashboard is public, so residents can check online whether a hotspot is working before they walk over.

We side with Drummond on the goal and with Lozano on the method. In our view, council should start with a one-year trial in two parks, with Bhullar’s secure mounts, Voss’s public dashboard and a separate budget line for stolen or broken gear. If uptime is steady and the costs hold, we would welcome a wider rollout. If not, the city will have learned cheaply. Either way, those students at the picnic tables deserve better than a borrowed signal from a coffee shop.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

The editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly doubts that park Wi-Fi would be as cheap as promised? 2.
.

Ramona Bhullar’s view would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Cedric Voss’s condition call for? 4.
.

The tone of the editorial is best described as 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

Our son finished his whole first term of grade nine on a park bench because the internet in our building kept failing, so this topic matters to our family. Viola Drummond claims that routers and lockboxes would 6.
, and council should check that math carefully. The IT analyst also asks for 7.
, which council should not treat as a small detail. Ramona Bhullar is wise to insist on 8.
, and I hope the pilot includes it from the first day. Cedric Voss reminds everyone that 9.
, and that point was nearly lost in the debate. The editorial’s count of 10.
stayed with me all evening.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...