Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #60312 Medium Concussions in Youth Hockey

Read the following article from a website.

Protecting young brains: helmets, habits, and a neck collar

As hockey camps open, parents again ask how to cut concussion risk. Helmets remain essential, yet they do not stop the brain from moving inside the skull. That limit led University of Toronto anesthesiologist Dr. Joseph Fisher and colleagues to design the Q-Collar, a device worn around the neck. By gently compressing neck veins, it slightly raises blood volume in the skull, which may reduce brain “slosh” on impact. Fisher stresses it is an added layer, not a helmet replacement.

Sports neurologist Dr. Laila Rahman welcomes research but urges caution. “Promising trials are not a permission slip for harder hits,” she said. She wants teams to keep reducing contact in practice regardless of new gear.

Winnipeg linebacker Adam Bighill has worn the collar and tells parents to read the studies rather than chase miracles. Parent coach Tanya Okeke is intrigued yet cost-conscious: she asks whether community leagues can afford devices for every player. Engineer Sam Ortiz notes fit and compliance matter; a poorly fitted collar helps no one.

Fisher agrees that behaviour and coaching culture still matter most. Rahman wants mandatory education sessions before any league endorses new equipment. Bighill says he will keep wearing the collar and the helmet. Okeke will wait for clearer pricing. Ortiz is drafting a simple fitting checklist for trainers.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

The best title for the article is 1.
.

Fisher is likely to agree that 2.
.

Rahman’s main warning is that 3.
.

Bighill advises parents to 4.
.

Okeke’s practical concern is 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

As a parent of three young hockey players, I want options that rest on solid evidence rather than hype. The idea that the collar works by 6.
is the part of the article I read twice. I also like that the inventor admits 7.
still matter most, even after years of work on the device. Rahman’s call for 8.
before any league signs on may slow things down, but I think the delay is a fair price when parents feel rushed by sales pitches. Bighill’s own habit of 9.
is the example I will point to when other parents ask me what the professionals actually do. Before our association buys anything at all, I want the coaches to follow Ortiz’s idea of 10.
.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...