Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #60225 Easy Start With the Attic

Read the following editorial from a website.

Scientists have shown that the climate is warming and that people are the main cause, mostly by burning coal, oil and gas. Nations have met since the 1980s to decide what to do about it. A shrinking share of the public still doubts that science. We are sure, and we believe our city’s proposed climate plan deserves council’s support next month.

The signs are visible close to home. Gardeners in our region see that planting zones have moved north, spring snow melts earlier than it used to, and heat waves come more often. The plan acts where the city has real power: in its buildings. Jovana Collier, the city’s sustainability manager, says homes and other buildings produce about half of local emissions. She proposes low-interest loans for heat pumps, insulation and new windows, repaid through the property tax bill so owners pay nothing up front. The plan also includes a rule that new buildings must meet a higher energy standard from 2028.

Brant Ackroyd, a spokesperson for regional home builders, warns that the new standard could add several thousand dollars to the price of a starter home. He asks council to introduce it gradually over three years so builders can train crews and find suppliers. Ivy Scully, who works with seniors on low incomes, argues that loans will not reach the people in the draftiest houses, because many of them are afraid of new debt. She wants grants instead of loans for owners below a set income, and a promise that landlords who use the program will not raise rents to pay for the work.

Hiro Gibbs, treasurer of a local taxpayers’ group, says he does not dispute the science but wants to know what each dollar buys. He will back the plan provided a report comes out every year showing how many tonnes of emissions were cut for every dollar spent. In our view, all three requests can be met, and we see no reason to wait. Council should phase in the building rule as Ackroyd asks, add Scully’s grants and rent promise, and publish the report Gibbs wants. A plan that is fair and open about its costs will last longer than one that is simply bold.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Who most clearly worries that the plan could make new homes more expensive? 2.
.

Ivy Scully’s position would most likely be supported by 3.
.

What outcome does Hiro Gibbs’s condition call for? 4.
.

The editorial’s main purpose is to 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

Our house was built in 1962, and last January the furnace ran almost without a break while cold air came straight through the living room windows. The editorial notes that 6.
, a change I had honestly never noticed until this morning. Jovana Collier’s idea of repaying the loans 7.
is clever, because it means we could begin this spring instead of saving for years. The seniors’ advocate also wants a promise that landlords in the program will not 8.
, and my daughter, who pays a landlord every month, will be glad to hear it. Even the taxpayers’ treasurer, who 9.
, sounds willing to be persuaded by honest numbers. Most of all, I like the closing line, which says a plan that is fair and open will 10.
.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...