Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #60215 Hard RD37

The Canada Pension Plan (CPP) covers all eligible Canadians. Based on the amount of earnings, a deduction is made from each pay cheque and deposited into Canada’s Pension Plan fund. Employers are also required to contribute to the plan for each of their employees. When an employee reaches 65 years of age, he or she is entitled to receive payments from the plan.

Many people believe that participation should be voluntary, but having a guaranteed stream of revenue into the plan means that the government can hopefully provide a stable return to contributors.

Another criticism of the plan is that the people who need it the most are the ones who receive the least. This is because the size of payments depends on the amount contributed, and the amount contributed depends on one’s level of income. People who have had little or low-paying employment thus receive low payments. And yet they are the ones who have been least able to put aside money of their own for their old age. It should be noted, however, that other government programs can provide financial assistance for people in need.

Some companies (especially large ones) have, in addition to this government plan, their own pension plans that work in essentially the same way. Deductions are also based on level of income, but part-time employees are often not eligible at all. This again seems to put those with lower incomes at a disadvantage. Even if someone has two part-time jobs that together equal a full-time job, he or she would be eligible to participate only in the Canada Pension Plan and probably not in the pension plans offered by either employer. But again, there are other programs.

Some critics consider both the government and employer pension plans to be patronizing. They believe that people should have complete freedom in whether and how much they save for their old age, along with how they invest what they save. Such critics seem to forget that they then wouldn’t benefit from government or employer contributions!

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

The author's purpose of the first paragraph is to 1.
.

The CPP and company pension plans are similar with respect to 2.
.

At 65 years of age, people with low-income part-time jobs will most likely 3.
.

If pension plans were voluntary, the critics mentioned in the last paragraph would likely 4.
.

Critics believe that the pension plans are patronizing because 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

I don't understand why employers are required to make CPP contributions. It shouldn't be their responsibility to ensure the government has a constant source of 6.
for re-investments. My guess is that having to contribute to the CPP 7.
many businesses. Even for larger companies, I was surprised by the author's opinion. Why is it problematic that most employer pension programs 8.
? Companies and individuals should be free to do what they want with their money. I can understand providing 9.
; employers want to see their employees at the workplace as much as possible, not absent due to illness. However, I agree with the critics, even if it means I miss out on 10.
.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...