Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: Satellite images showed the team where waves had probably struck, and at those sites they found sand deposits, debris and scars on trees.
Why this is correct: Look at paragraph C: the team looked at the sites where waves had probably struck. There they found sand deposits, debris and scars on trees. Scars on trees are damage to the bark, and they showed where the water had come.
Tips: Link 'damage to the bark' with 'scars on trees'.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: In paragraph A, the writer tells what happened on the day of the quake, such as homes swept away. Nobody is searching for evidence yet.
- B: Paragraph B explains why a tsunami was not expected and what the warning centre did. Trees are not mentioned.
- D: The fourth paragraph discusses the causes of the waves, like landslides and a new fault, not the marks left on land.
- E: The scars on trees that the survey team found are listed in Paragraph C.
Correct Answer: A
Passage Reference: At Grand Goave, on the Bay of Port-au-Prince, a man and two boys who had stayed on the shore to watch were killed by a wave, and several homes near the water were swept away.
Why this is correct: Notice that paragraph A tells of a man and two boys at Grand Goave. They had stayed on the shore to watch and were killed by a wave. A man and two boys make three people, and staying to watch means waiting to see.
Tips: Count the people: a man and two boys are three.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Paragraph B talks about a police station that collapsed, but it does not report anyone killed by a wave.
- C: The Bay of Port-au-Prince appears in Paragraph C too, but only for the average wave height. No deaths are given there.
- D: Paragraph D is about landslides, faults and gaps in the record. It does not describe any victims.
- E: The man and two boys killed while watching from the shore are described in Paragraph A.
Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: Several weeks later, Hermann Fritz, a coastal engineer at the Georgia Institute of Technology, travelled around the Haitian coast with four Haitian colleagues to collect evidence before it disappeared.
Why this is correct: Look at paragraph C: Hermann Fritz, a coastal engineer, travelled around the Haitian coast with four Haitian colleagues. They went to collect evidence. Partners means colleagues, and proof means evidence.
Tips: The fourth paragraph also mentions research teams. Look for the paragraph with the trip along the coast.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Notice that paragraph A describes the coast on the day of the quake, with survivors and fishermen, not a team of researchers.
- B: A warning centre measures a wave in Paragraph B, but no one travels along the coast to study it.
- D: Look at paragraph D: it reports what survey teams found about uplift, landslides and the fault. But it does not describe a trip along the Haitian coast.
- E: The coastal engineer's trip with four Haitian colleagues is described in Paragraph C.
Correct Answer: E
Passage Reference: Fritz also reported that Haiti had no tsunami warning signs on its beaches, unlike some other Caribbean countries.
Why this is correct: In paragraph C, the writer says Haiti had no tsunami warning signs on its beaches. It does not say that anyone put signs up after the survey, so this later step is not in the passage.
Tips: Paragraph C says there were no signs. Check whether any paragraph says signs came later.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: People on beaches appear in Paragraph A, but only watching the waves on the day of the quake. No signs are mentioned.
- B: The second paragraph describes a telephone alert and a cancelled watch. It says nothing about signs on beaches.
- C: Notice that paragraph C reports that there were no warning signs on Haitian beaches. It does not say any were added after the survey.
- D: Notice that paragraph D is about the causes of the waves and what is still unknown, not about new signs.
Correct Answer: D
Passage Reference: Early reports placed the earthquake on the Enriquillo-Plantain Garden fault, but another group later showed that it ruptured a separate, unmapped fault.
Why this is correct: Paragraph D says another group showed that the earthquake ruptured a separate, unmapped fault. Unmapped means that no one had drawn it on a map.
Tips: Faults are discussed in more than one place. Look for a word that means nobody had drawn it on a map.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Look at paragraph A: it gives the date and size of the quake, but nothing about which fault moved.
- B: Faults are discussed in Paragraph B, but only as the sideways kind that rarely lifts the seafloor. It does not say a fault was unknown.
- C: The third paragraph covers the survey of the coast and the wave heights. It does not name any fault.
- E: The separate, unmapped fault that the earthquake ruptured is reported in Paragraph D.
Correct Answer: A
Passage Reference: Near the border with the Dominican Republic, fishermen took photos and videos as the sea drew back.
Why this is correct: Notice that paragraph A describes the coast near the border with the Dominican Republic. There, fishermen took photos and videos as the sea drew back. Fishermen fish for a living, and photos and videos are recordings.
Tips: Satellite images in Paragraph C are a trap. Look for people with cameras.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Look at paragraph B: it mentions a wave measured at Santo Domingo, but not people filming the sea.
- C: Satellite images are used in Paragraph C to find wave sites. Nobody films the water there.
- D: Notice that paragraph D is about causes and the short record of tsunamis. No photos or videos are mentioned.
- E: Fishermen taking photos and videos as the sea drew back is reported in Paragraph A.
Correct Answer: B
Passage Reference: In Haiti itself, the alert arrived by telephone at a police station that had already collapsed.
Why this is correct: Look at paragraph B: it says that in Haiti the alert arrived by telephone at a police station that had already collapsed. An alert is a message about danger, and a collapsed station is a building that has fallen down.
Tips: Warning signs and a warning message are different things. Ask which one was sent, and how it arrived.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Homes are swept away in Paragraph A, but no message or alert is mentioned.
- C: Notice that paragraph C mentions warning signs, saying Haiti had none on its beaches. It does not describe an alert being sent.
- D: In paragraph D, the writer covers the science of the waves. It says nothing about alerts or damaged buildings.
- E: The alert that reached a collapsed police station by telephone is reported in Paragraph B.
Correct Answer: E
Passage Reference: Several weeks later, Hermann Fritz, a coastal engineer at the Georgia Institute of Technology, travelled around the Haitian coast with four Haitian colleagues to collect evidence before it disappeared.
Why this is correct: Look at paragraph C: it says the team set out several weeks after the quake. It does not say how long they spent on the coast, so the length of the survey is not given.
Tips: 'Several weeks later' tells when the trip started, not how long it lasted.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Look at paragraph A: it covers only the day of the quake, before any study of the coast began.
- B: The second paragraph gives a wave height and the cancelled watch. No research trip is mentioned.
- C: Notice that paragraph C says when the team went, several weeks after the quake, but not how long their work took.
- D: Look at paragraph D: it reports what research teams found, but it gives no length for any survey.
Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: At least one reached land about 100 kilometres from the epicentre, the point on the surface above where the quake began.
Why this is correct: In paragraph C, the writer says at least one wave reached land about 100 kilometres from the epicentre. It explains that the epicentre is the point above where the quake began. The distance and the starting point match.
Tips: Match 'a hundred kilometres' with '100 kilometres' and 'where the shaking started' with 'epicentre'.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A describes waves at Grand Goave and near the border, but it gives no distances.
- B: A wave of 12 centimetres at Santo Domingo is in Paragraph B, but no distance from the quake is given.
- D: The fourth paragraph talks about how often landslide tsunamis happen, not how far one wave travelled.
- E: The wave that reached land about 100 kilometres from the epicentre appears in Paragraph C.