You are in free guest mode.
Timed Practice
Revision List
Attempt History
Progress Tracking
Create a free account to unlock these tools
LanguageCert Practice Listening: Part 2 (Long Conversation)
ID: #60333
Hard
Yellow 7
Instructions
You will hear five conversations. Listen to the conversations and answer the questions. Choose the correct answer. You will hear each conversation twice.
Transcript:
Listening Part 2 You will hear 5 conversations. Listen to the conversations and answer the questions. Choose the correct answer. You will hear each conversation twice. Conversation 1 You hear a student talking to a university accommodation officer. Hi, are you the accommodation officer? One of them, yes. How can I help? I'm finding it really difficult to live with the other students in my apartment. My course is really full on, like I've got so much work to do and I don't know whether they've got less to do or what, but I just can't concentrate on my work. They're quite noisy. I've asked them to keep the noise down at least during the day, but it doesn't seem to make any difference and I'm struggling. I don't really want to get mad or fall out with them, but my grades are starting to suffer and I can't afford that. I see. Have you pointed out the quiet times policy to them? I don't want to sound like I'm ordering them about. And anyway, those times are mainly at night and it's not so much of a problem then because I'm having my own downtime. I've tried going to the library, but it's hard to find an empty desk sometimes. Is there a chance of a room somewhere else? Or maybe someone would be willing to swap. I guess you could talk to the others on my behalf. It'd be so embarrassing though. I understand. Conversation one. Hi, are you the accommodation officer? One of them, yes. How can I help? I'm finding it really difficult to live with the other students in my apartment. My course is really full on, like I've got so much work to do and I don't know whether they've got less to do or what, but I just can't concentrate on my work. They're quite noisy. I've asked them to keep the noise down at least during the day, but it doesn't seem to make any difference and I'm struggling. I don't really want to get mad or fall out with them, but my grades are starting to suffer and I can't afford that. I see. Have you pointed out the quiet times policy to them? I don't want to sound like I'm ordering them about. And anyway, those times are mainly at night, and it's not so much of a problem then, because I'm having my own downtime. I've tried going to the library, but it's hard to find an empty desk sometimes. Is there a chance of a room somewhere else? Or maybe someone would be willing to swap? I guess you could talk to the others on my behalf. It'd be so embarrassing though. I understand. Conversation 2. You hear two students talking about a presentation they've just given. How do you think that went? I was surprised by how many people from the department attended. Perhaps we should have given more thought to what they'd want to know more about at the end. I found myself struggling to deal with what they came up with. I had expected some of it and we didn't do too badly. We ought to have adjusted the screens in advance though. It meant people towards the back couldn't see properly. That's frustrating. We really should have thought about that. No doubt it'll affect our grade. But good thinking on adding in that extra slide with the graphs on. I'd totally overlooked that. It was very last minute, but we needed it. Anyway, we've got to find a time that suits both of us for writing up our report. Sure. Did we finalise who's doing what? I know we went backwards and forwards last time we discussed it. I sent a list by e-mail, if you remember. We hadn't completely made our minds up, though. OK, so we should finalise that. Are we still aiming for the 31st for the rough version? Fine by me. And we're making it fairly informal, right? Semi-formal is what we agreed, actually. Conversation 2 How do you think that went? I was surprised by how many people from the department attended. Perhaps we should have given more thought to what they'd want to know more about at the end. I found myself struggling to deal with what they came up with. I had expected some of it and we didn't do too badly. We ought to have adjusted the screens in advance though. It meant people towards the back couldn't see properly. That's frustrating. We really should have thought about that. No doubt it'll affect our grade. But good thinking on adding in that extra slide with the graphs on. I'd totally overlooked that. It was very last minute, but we needed it. Anyway, we've got to find a time that suits both of us for writing up our report. Sure. Did we finalise who's doing what? I know we went backwards and forwards last time we discussed it. I sent a list by e-mail, if you remember. We hadn't completely made our minds up, though. OK, so we should finalise that. Are we still aiming for the 31st for the rough version? Fine by me. And we're making it fairly informal, right? Semi-formal is what we agreed, actually. Conversation 3 You hear a student talking to his course tutor about his latest essay. Hi, you wanted to talk to me? Yes, about your essay. I can see that you made efforts to answer the question that was asked, and that wasn't unsuccessful on the whole. However, I noticed that you'd relied heavily on one particular source. rather than following up on the reading list as I suggested. Were you unsure about what was expected of you? I know all of this is still fairly new, but we do need to get it sorted out now because it will affect your grades. Oh, right, OK. Well, I found this article that just said everything I wanted to include. I did look at other stuff. But it either seemed to say more or less the same thing as the historian whose article I read, or even stuff I really didn't agree with. I mean, I put it all into my own words, like we were told to, and when I did include direct quotes, I put the acknowledgments in brackets and everything. Right. Well, it's important to consider different angles to a topic and find ways to support your own arguments. Can I send you a referencing guide that might help explain things in a different way? Hi, you wanted to talk to me? Yes, about your essay. I can see that you made efforts to answer the question that was asked, and that wasn't unsuccessful on the whole. However, I noticed that you'd relied heavily on one particular source rather than following up on the reading list, as I suggested. Were you unsure about what was expected of you? I know all of this is still fairly new, but we do need to get it sorted out now, because it will affect your grades. Oh, right, OK. Well, I found this article that just said everything I wanted to include. I did look at other stuff, but it either seemed to say more or less the same thing as the historian whose article I read, or even stuff I really didn't agree with. I mean, I put it all into my own words, like we were told to, and when I did include direct quotes, I put the acknowledgments in brackets and everything. Right. Well, it's important to consider different angles to a topic and find ways to support your own arguments. Can I send you a referencing guide that might help explain things in a different way? Yes, please. Conversation 4 You hear two students talking about an essay they're doing. How are you getting on with your essay about language? Okay, I'm still doing the background reading and trying to fully get my head around the various theories that linguists have put forward historically. I know we've been over it in the seminar, but I'm trying to keep up with so many conflicting theories. Anyway, I've just been looking at Skinner's behaviorist theory, you know, that kids mimic speech and learn language when they get positive reinforcement from parents? The one that was criticized by other linguists. Yeah, it couldn't account for the fast pace of language acquisition or the fact kids construct sentences they've never heard anyone say. And then there was Chomsky's idea of the language acquisition device that everyone has. Which was... remind me? Kids have a biological ability that enables them to acquire language rules and structures effortlessly. Right. But that ignored the impact of social interaction, didn't it? Yeah. It's incredible to think that those theories are decades old, and linguists are still arguing about the developmental processes that lead to language acquisition. It's still unsettled. That's weird. Yeah, and there's so much to get to grips with. Like most unresolved arguments, it swings one way, then the other, and back again, trying to get to the truth. Conversation 4. How are you getting on with your essay about language? Okay, I'm still doing the background reading and trying to fully get my head around the various theories that linguists have put forward historically. I know we've been over it in the seminar, but I'm trying to keep up with so many conflicting theories. Anyway, I've just been looking at Skinner's behaviorist theory, you know, that kids mimic speech and learn language when they get positive reinforcement from parents? The one that was criticized by other linguists. Yeah, it couldn't account for the fast pace of language acquisition or the fact kids construct sentences they've never heard anyone say. And then there was Chomsky's idea of the language acquisition device that everyone has. Which was... remind me? Kids have a biological ability that enables them to acquire language rules and structures effortlessly. Right. But that ignored the impact of social interaction, didn't it? Yeah. It's incredible to think that those theories are decades old. And linguists are still arguing about the developmental processes that lead to language acquisition. It's still unsettled. That's weird. Yeah, and there's so much to get to grips with. Like most unresolved arguments, it swings one way, then the other, and back again, trying to get to the truth. Conversation 5. You hear two students talking about free time activities. Did you try out for the university football team in the end? Not yet. I've got a dilemma. I want to participate in activities outside my studies. I'm already a fully-fledged member of the Amateur Dramatic Society. Plus, I work out each morning ahead of lectures. I thought I might be spreading myself too thinly at first, though I reckon I can squeeze practice in if I'm organized on the work front. It's going to get trickier as time goes on, balancing our study and social lives. As long as you meet expectations study-wise, where's the harm in doing whatever makes you happy? If we don't do that now, when will we ever? I know some people are overly cautious about what they take on. If you're worried, Why don't you take a step back and consider where your priorities lie? I mean, I do want to join the football team and I can see it would boost my fitness and stuff. The thing that's holding me back is that I'm not entirely confident of my abilities. I was successful in my college team. University level, though. How does that compare, I wonder? Well, there's only one way to find out. Did you try out for the university football team in the end? Not yet. I've got a dilemma. I want to participate in activities outside my studies. I'm already a fully-fledged member of the Amateur Dramatic Society. Plus, I work out each morning ahead of lectures. I thought I might be spreading myself too thinly at first. though I reckon I can squeeze practice in if I'm organized on the work front. It's going to get trickier as time goes on, balancing our study and social lives. As long as you meet expectations study-wise, where's the harm in doing whatever makes you happy? If we don't do that now, when will we ever? I know some people are overly cautious about what they take on. If you're worried, Why don't you take a step back and consider where your priorities lie? I mean, I do want to join the football team and I can see it would boost my fitness and stuff. The thing that's holding me back is that I'm not entirely confident of my abilities. I was successful in my college team. University level, though. How does that compare, I wonder? Well, there's only one way to find out.
Conversation 1
You hear a student talking to a university accommodation officer.
1
What problem is the student reporting about the people she shares an apartment with?
2
What would she like the accommodation officer to do?
Conversation 2
You hear two students talking about a presentation they’ve just given.
3
What do they both feel annoyed with themselves about?
4
What have they yet to decide about their report?
Conversation 3
You hear a student talking to his course tutor about his latest essay.
5
What concerns the tutor about the student’s use of sources?
6
What point does the student make about his essay?
Conversation 4
You hear two students talking about an essay they’re doing.
7
How does the woman feel about the topic?
8
The students agree about how strange it seems that
Conversation 5
You hear two students talking about free-time activities.
9
The woman reacts to the man’s concerns by
10
What concerns the man about joining the football team?
Result:
Explanation
{<br> "questions": [<br> {<br> "question": 1,<br> "correct_answer": "C",<br> "why_correct": "Her flatmates ignore what she asks. She says 'I've asked them to keep the noise down... but it doesn't seem to make any difference'. This matches <b>Option C</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because she says 'I don't really want to get mad or fall out with them' - there is no argument. This is an inference trap.",<br> "B": "<b>Option B</b> is wrong because she only wonders if they have less work, not that they skip classes. This is a detail-vs-gist trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what happens when she asks them",<br> "Focus on the words it doesn't make any difference"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Ignored requests means she asked but nothing changed.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Student: <u>I've asked them to keep the noise down at least during the day, but it doesn't seem to make any difference and I'm struggling.</u>"<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 2,<br> "correct_answer": "B",<br> "why_correct": "She wants help finding another place. She asks 'Is there a chance of a room somewhere else? Or maybe someone would be willing to swap'. This matches <b>Option B</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because she does not want to sound like she is ordering them about. This is an inference trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because the quiet-times rules exist, but she does not want them enforced. This is a lexical overlap trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what she asks the officer for",<br> "Focus on the words a room somewhere else"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Her request is the help she directly asks for.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Student: <u>Is there a chance of a room somewhere else? Or maybe someone would be willing to swap.</u>"<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 3,<br> "correct_answer": "A",<br> "why_correct": "They both blame themselves for the screens. They say 'We ought to have adjusted the screens in advance' so people could see. This matches <b>Option A</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "B": "<b>Option B</b> is wrong because one struggled with questions, but the other 'had expected some of it' - not a shared regret. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because they added the extra graph slide - they did not leave data out. This is a lexical overlap trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for the mistake they both regret",<br> "Focus on the words adjusted the screens in advance"<br> ],<br> "tips": "A shared regret is one both speakers admit to.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...<u>We ought to have adjusted the screens in advance though. It meant people towards the back couldn't see properly.</u> ... We really should have thought about that..."<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 4,<br> "correct_answer": "B",<br> "why_correct": "They still have to decide who writes what. They say 'We hadn't completely made our minds up... we should finalise that'. This matches <b>Option B</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because the style is already set - 'Semi-formal is what we agreed'. This is a correction trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because the date is agreed - 'the 31st... Fine by me'. This is a detail-vs-gist trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what is still undecided",<br> "Focus on the words who's doing what"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Listen for the one thing they say they still need to sort out.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Did we finalise who's doing what? ... <u>We hadn't completely made our minds up, though. OK, so we should finalise that.</u>"<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 5,<br> "correct_answer": "B",<br> "why_correct": "The tutor is worried he ignored her advice. She says he 'relied heavily on one particular source, rather than following up on the reading list as I suggested'. This matches <b>Option B</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because the problem is using too few sources, not using ones she did not recommend. This is a lexical overlap trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because he did list his quotes in brackets; referencing is not the issue. This is a detail-vs-gist trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what advice he did not follow",<br> "Focus on the words rather than following up on the reading list"<br> ],<br> "tips": "The concern is the exact suggestion he did not take.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Tutor: <u>you'd relied heavily on one particular source, rather than following up on the reading list as I suggested.</u>"<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 6,<br> "correct_answer": "B",<br> "why_correct": "He says he strongly agreed with one writer. He found an article that 'just said everything I wanted to include' and matched the historian he read. This matches <b>Option B</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because he easily found an article saying everything he wanted - not too little to say. This is an inference trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because he confidently did his acknowledgments; organising references was not his point. This is a lexical overlap trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what he says about that one article",<br> "Focus on the words said everything I wanted to include"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Agreeing strongly shows when he says the writer matched his own view.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Student: <u>I found this article that just said everything I wanted to include.</u> ... other stuff... seemed to say more or less the same thing as the historian whose article I read..."<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 7,<br> "correct_answer": "C",<br> "why_correct": "She knows she still has a lot to learn. She says she is 'trying to keep up with so many conflicting theories'. This matches <b>Option C</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because she is grappling with many theories, not focused on understanding just one. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.",<br> "B": "<b>Option B</b> is wrong because she feels overwhelmed by the number, not impressed by it. This is an inference trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for how she feels about the theories",<br> "Focus on the words keep up with so many"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Awareness of a gap shows in phrases like still getting my head around it.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Woman: I'm still doing the background reading and trying to fully get my head around the various theories... <u>I'm trying to keep up with so many conflicting theories.</u>"<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 8,<br> "correct_answer": "A",<br> "why_correct": "They find it strange experts still disagree. They say the theories are 'decades old, and linguists are still arguing... It's still unsettled'. This matches <b>Option A</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "B": "<b>Option B</b> is wrong because both theories were criticised; no point is made about one surviving. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because the fast pace is a fact Skinner could not explain, not the strange thing they agree on. This is a lexical overlap trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what they both find weird",<br> "Focus on the words still unsettled"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Lack of consensus means experts still cannot agree.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...<u>those theories are decades old, and linguists are still arguing about the developmental processes that lead to language acquisition. It's still unsettled.</u> That's weird..."<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 9,<br> "correct_answer": "B",<br> "why_correct": "She tells him to stick with what he wants. She says 'where's the harm in doing whatever makes you happy? If we don't do that now, when will we ever?' This matches <b>Option B</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because she does not offer a different plan; she backs his wish to join. This is an inference trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because she mentions cautious people but does not warn him against others' negativity. This is a lexical overlap trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for the woman's encouraging line",<br> "Focus on the words when will we ever"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Backing his plan shows in phrases like where's the harm in doing it.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Woman: <u>where's the harm in doing whatever makes you happy? If we don't do that now, when will we ever?</u>"<br> },<br> {<br> "question": 10,<br> "correct_answer": "B",<br> "why_correct": "He worries he may not be good enough. He says 'The thing that's holding me back is that I'm not entirely confident of my abilities'. This matches <b>Option B</b>.",<br> "incorrect_options": {<br> "A": "<b>Option A</b> is wrong because he thinks he can 'squeeze practice in if I'm organized' - time is not the real worry. This is a correction trap.",<br> "C": "<b>Option C</b> is wrong because he can see it would 'boost my fitness' - the benefits are clear. This is an inference trap."<br> },<br> "key_listening_points": [<br> "Listen for what is holding him back",<br> "Focus on the words not confident of my abilities"<br> ],<br> "tips": "Required standard links to doubts about ability and university level.",<br> "transcript_reference": "...Man: <u>The thing that's holding me back is that I'm not entirely confident of my abilities.</u> ... Woman: University level, though. How does that compare?..."<br> }<br> ]<br>}
With a free account:
Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...