Correct Answer: whether to turn a church into apartments
Passage Reference: A housing charity has offered to buy the building and turn most of it into apartments.
Why this is correct: A housing charity wants to buy the blogger’s church and turn most of it into apartments. The whole post weighs that offer before the congregation votes.
Tips: For a “mainly about” question, find the offer and the vote in the first paragraph. Each speaker then gives a view on that offer.
Why the other options are wrong:
- how a church can pay its heating bill: The heating bill is mentioned as one reason the church is struggling. But the post is about the offer to convert it.
- why fewer people go to church today: The writer says only forty people come on Sundays but never explains why attendance has fallen.
- where to build a new rapid bus stop: Rapid bus stops come up only as a reason churches make good housing sites. Nobody plans a new stop.
Correct Answer: Ambrose Delisle
Passage Reference: no photograph could ever stand in for them
Why this is correct: Ambrose Delisle says gutting the interior would destroy the carved ceiling and painted wall. He adds that no photograph could ever stand in for them.
Tips: Read each speaker’s worry about the building. Ask whose worry is about the beauty inside the hall, not about cost, parking or housing.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Ingeborg Sorensen: Ingeborg Sorensen wants to convert the church and talks about empty buildings near transit, not about what photographs cannot replace.
- Rukhsana Chowdhury: Rukhsana Chowdhury asks for a plan to protect old features, but her point is about pricing upgrades, not about photographs.
- Gaspard Trottier: Gaspard Trottier talks about a moving fund and parking, not about the church’s interior.
Correct Answer: a list of empty churches close to rapid buses
Passage Reference: argues that empty churches near rapid transit are some of the best building sites left in the city
Why this is correct: Sorensen argues that empty churches near rapid transit are excellent building sites. She points to a count of half-used churches near rapid bus stops. A list like that supports her position.
Tips: First find Sorensen’s reason for her view. Then pick the proof that would make that reason stronger.
Why the other options are wrong:
- a survey of members who want to stay: Members who want to stay in the building would work against a sale, which is Sorensen’s plan.
- an estimate of the cost of new fire exits: Fire-exit costs relate to Chowdhury’s warning that projects stall, not to Sorensen’s case for using churches as housing.
- a count of parking spaces near the church: Parking is Trottier’s concern. The number of spaces says nothing about whether churches make good housing sites.
Correct Answer: upgrade costs would be settled before demolition began
Passage Reference: the cost of those upgrades and a written plan for protecting the old features are agreed before any demolition permit is issued
Why this is correct: Chowdhury supports the plan only if two things are agreed before any demolition permit is issued. These are the cost of the upgrades and a plan for old features. So costs are settled before demolition begins.
Tips: Chowdhury’s condition follows “if” in the third paragraph. Read that clause to the end and match its idea in other words.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the charity would skip the fire and elevator work: Chowdhury wants the fire exits and elevators priced, not skipped.
- demolition would start while the costs were studied: Chowdhury wants the costs agreed before any demolition permit, so demolition cannot start first.
- the city would pay for every needed upgrade: Chowdhury asks for the costs to be agreed, but she never says the city should pay them.
Correct Answer: inform fellow members before they vote
Passage Reference: I am writing this so that the people in our pews know what each side is saying before we raise our hands
Why this is correct: The blogger says the post is written so that the people in the pews know what each side is saying. That should happen before the congregation votes in May.
Tips: Sometimes the writer tells you the purpose directly. Look for “I am writing this so that” near the start.
Why the other options are wrong:
- persuade the charity to raise its offer: The size of the charity’s offer is never discussed.
- ask readers to donate toward the heating: The heating bill is mentioned as a problem, but the blogger never asks for donations.
- argue that the church should never be sold: Look at the last paragraph: the writer says “I will vote yes” if certain conditions are met. So the post does not oppose every sale.
Correct Answer: the stone front and the round window
Passage Reference: She would keep the stone front and the round window exactly as they are
Why this is correct: Sorensen says she would keep the stone front and the round window exactly as they are.
Tips: The comment says “exactly as they are”, which are Sorensen’s own words. Find her sentence and read what she would keep.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the pews and the old organ: The pews and an organ are never part of Sorensen’s promise.
- the side wings and the bell tower: The side wings are where Delisle could accept apartments, and no bell tower is mentioned.
- the carved ceiling and the altar: The carved ceiling and the wall behind the altar are what Delisle fears will be destroyed. Sorensen does not promise to keep them.
Correct Answer: the same twelve spaces
Passage Reference: He also wants the charity to publish a parking plan, so that Sunday worshippers and new tenants are not fighting over the same twelve spaces.
Why this is correct: Trottier is the pastor down the street. He wants the charity to publish a parking plan. Then Sunday worshippers and new tenants will not be fighting over the same twelve spaces.
Tips: The comment calls him “the pastor down the street”. Find his second request and read it to the end.
Why the other options are wrong:
- a single loading zone: A loading zone is never mentioned. Trottier’s worry is the twelve parking spaces.
- the church’s front steps: The front steps are never part of Trottier’s parking worry.
- one narrow driveway: No driveway is mentioned. The blog post talks about twelve parking spaces.
Correct Answer: help remaining members find a new church
Passage Reference: any sale should set aside money to help the remaining members find a new place to worship
Why this is correct: Trottier, the pastor down the street, says any sale should set aside money. It would help the remaining members find a new place to worship.
Tips: The comment calls him the pastor down the street. Look for his request about money and put it in your own words.
Why the other options are wrong:
- repair the roof of the smaller church: Trottier leads a smaller church, but he never asks for money to repair its roof.
- pay for a new organ for the choir: An organ is never mentioned in the blog post. The blogger’s choir is part of the church being sold.
- hire a full-time caretaker for the building: Trottier asks for a moving fund and a parking plan, not a caretaker.
Correct Answer: half of what it collects
Passage Reference: the heating bill alone eats half of what we collect
Why this is correct: In the first paragraph, the heating bill alone eats half of what the congregation collects.
Tips: The comment asks about the cost of staying warm. Find the sentence about the heating bill and read the amount carefully.
Why the other options are wrong:
- a third of its yearly budget: The blog post gives the heating cost as half of the collection, not a third of a budget.
- more than it collects: The heating bill eats half of the collection, not more than all of it.
- twice what it paid last year: The heating bill is never compared with last year’s.
Correct Answer: has sung in the choir for decades
Passage Reference: I have sung in the choir at our church on Elm Street in Winnipeg for thirty-one years
Why this is correct: The blogger says they have sung in the church choir for thirty-one years, which is more than three decades.
Tips: The comment asks about the writer’s own life. Read the opening sentence and match what it says about the writer.
Why the other options are wrong:
- leads the housing charity’s board: The writer is a member of the congregation. Sorensen works for the charity, and nobody leads its board in the post.
- was baptized in one of the side wings: The writer was married under the round window. A baptism is never mentioned.
- works in the city planning office: The city planner in the blog post is Chowdhury, not the blogger.