Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Reading: Reading for Viewpoints ID: #63199 Easy Open the Museum Doors, With Limits

Read the following editorial from a website.

The board of our city museum will vote next month on whether to offer one free evening every month. We think it should say yes, but only with limits it can measure. A museum paid for partly by public money should not feel closed to the people who fund it, and right now the price of an evening ticket is enough to keep many working families outside.

Yolanda Espinoza, who leads public programs, has argued most clearly for free nights. She told a board workshop that partner museums saw evening attendance climb after they began opening free once a month. “People who come once for free often come back and pay,” Espinoza said. She believes café and gift-shop sales can make up much of the lost ticket money, as long as entry is timed and the building is properly staffed. We take seriously the concerns of finance chair Zoltan Holm, who warns that free evenings may eat into prepaid tickets and membership renewals, which pay for the travelling exhibits that draw visitors in the first place. “A generous idea still has to cover the shipping bill,” he told the board. Holm wants a firm cap on attendance and a written goal for donor support before any permanent calendar is approved.

School liaison Zainab Rahimi adds a point that deserves more attention, and says evening slots already sell out early, leaving teachers unable to book visits for students whose parents work during the day. Rahimi supports free nights but, like Holm, wants a published crowd limit. Community board member Ayesha Lemaire argues that the museum should release crowd counts and revenue figures after every free night, so the board can adjust quickly.

Holm is right that a generous idea must still pay its way, and the capped trial we propose respects that. The board should approve a one-year pilot with timed tickets, a clear attendance cap and a set number of places kept for school groups. The museum should publish its numbers each month, as Lemaire asks. If the figures show real harm to exhibits, the board can change course. If they show new visitors, as we expect, our city will be richer for it.

Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.

This editorial is mainly about 1.
.

Yolanda Espinoza’s position would most likely be supported by 2.
.

Who most clearly worries that free nights could reduce membership income? 3.
.

What outcome does Ayesha Lemaire’s proposal call for? 4.
.

The tone of the editorial is best described as 5.
.

The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.

Did anyone at your paper actually visit the museum on a weekday evening before writing this? Rahimi says 6.
, and if that is true, the pilot has to fix it first. The finance chair wants 7.
before anything becomes permanent, and I cannot see why that should hold up a trial year. Espinoza believes that 8.
, and I would like to see the evidence behind that claim. Last spring the queues for an open house blocked my driveway until ten, so I am not against free evenings, only against unplanned ones. Your plan to 9.
sounds sensible to me. Your closing paragraph also promises that the board can change course if 10.
, and I plan to remind the board of that promise.

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet — submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...