Correct Answer: D
Passage Reference: They also found no peer-reviewed evidence that mature trees send extra resources to their own offspring, and concluded that knowledge of the networks is too sparse and unsettled to guide forest management.
Why this is correct: Look at Paragraph D. The 2023 review found no peer-reviewed evidence that mature trees send extra resources to their own offspring. Older trees and their young are the same idea in simpler words.
Tips: Find the 2023 review. Then check whether it deals with older trees helping their own young.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A explains what the plant and the fungus each get from the partnership. It does not mention parent trees or any review.
- B: Paragraph B describes the different forms these partnerships take. There is nothing in it about trees helping their offspring.
- C: Paragraph C does report carbon moving between trees in 1997. But those were two different species, not a parent tree and its young.
- E: The missing evidence about parent trees is reported in Paragraph D, in the part about the 2023 review.
Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: In 1997, a team including Suzanne Simard, now a forest ecologist at the University of British Columbia, reported in the journal Nature that carbon moved in both directions between birch and Douglas fir seedlings in the field.
Why this is correct: The clue is in Paragraph C. The 1997 team found that carbon moved in both directions between birch and Douglas fir seedlings. Both ways means in both directions.
Tips: Paragraph D also talks about field evidence. Find the paragraph that gives the result of one experiment.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A says the fungus takes sugars from its plant. That is about one plant and one fungus, not carbon moving between two trees.
- B: Paragraph B describes forms of partnership and Canadian forests. It reports no experiment and no carbon moving.
- D: Paragraph D is about a later review of field evidence. It does not describe the early experiment or its result.
- E: The 1997 carbon result is given in Paragraph C. It says the carbon moved in both directions.
Correct Answer: B
Passage Reference: The most widespread form, called arbuscular mycorrhizae, is found in about 90 per cent of seed plants, and in it the fungus grows inside the cells of the root's outer layer.
Why this is correct: You can find this in Paragraph B. Arbuscular mycorrhizae are the most widespread type. In them, the fungus grows inside the cells of the root's outer layer.
Tips: Find the most common type of partnership. Then check exactly where its fungus lives in the root.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A gives a share of seed plants with these partnerships. It does not say where the fungus sits in the root.
- C: Paragraph C describes threads that spread out from a root tip. It does not talk about fungi inside root cells.
- D: Paragraph D covers a long study and a review of evidence. The inside of a root is not described.
- E: Paragraph B explains that in the most widespread type, the fungus grows inside root cells.
Correct Answer: C
Passage Reference: The fungi grow many branching threads, called mycelium, that spread out from a root tip and can join the roots of other trees and plants.
Why this is correct: Look at Paragraph C. The fungal threads spread out from a root tip and can join the roots of other trees and plants. Plants linked this way share a network.
Tips: Paragraph B also mentions threads. Ask which paragraph has threads reaching a different plant.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A describes one plant and its fungus helping each other. It does not say a fungus links two plants.
- B: In Paragraph B, the fungal threads pass between root cells. That happens inside one root, so it does not connect plants.
- D: Paragraph D asks how much the networks matter. It does not explain how two plants become linked.
- E: How plants become linked is described in Paragraph C. The threads join the roots of other plants.
Correct Answer: E
Passage Reference: The most widespread form, called arbuscular mycorrhizae, is found in about 90 per cent of seed plants, and in it the fungus grows inside the cells of the root's outer layer.
Why this is correct: Look at Paragraph B. In one form the fungus grows inside root cells, and in the other it wraps the root in a sheath. The paragraph never says which form gives the plant more.
Tips: Paragraph B describes two forms side by side. Check whether it says one form is better.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A lists minerals that plants absorb better with a fungus partner. It does not compare one form of partnership with another.
- B: Paragraph B describes both forms of partnership. However, it never says which form supplies more to the plant.
- C: Paragraph C is about carbon moving between two trees. It does not compare the two forms of partnership.
- D: Paragraph D covers a long study and a review of network claims. Neither one compares the two forms.
Correct Answer: A
Passage Reference: In return, the fungus takes sugars directly from the plant, so it does not have to compete with other microorganisms for its food.
Why this is correct: The clue is in Paragraph A. The fungus takes sugars directly from the plant. So it does not have to compete with other microorganisms, which are tiny living things.
Tips: Focus on what the fungus gets out of the partnership. How does it get its food, and does it compete?
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Paragraph B describes where the fungus grows in or around the root. It does not say how the fungus gets food.
- C: Paragraph C reports carbon moving between two trees. It does not mention competition with other organisms.
- D: Paragraph D talks about resources passing to seedlings. It says nothing about the fungus competing for food.
- E: Paragraph A tells you this. The fungus takes sugars from the plant and avoids competing with microorganisms.
Correct Answer: D
Passage Reference: Simard now leads the Mother Tree Project, a 100-year study of different harvesting approaches in the Douglas fir forests of British Columbia's Interior.
Why this is correct: Look at Paragraph D. Simard leads a 100-year study that looks at different harvesting approaches. A century is 100 years, and harvesting trees means cutting them down.
Tips: The idea is a very long project. Check that it compares several ways of logging.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A explains what mycorrhizae are and why they matter. No study or forest harvest is mentioned.
- B: Paragraph B says most Canadian forests are dominated by one kind of tree partner. It says nothing about harvesting forests.
- C: Paragraph C also mentions Douglas fir, but in a 1997 seedling experiment. That is not a study about cutting forests.
- E: The 100-year study of harvesting approaches appears in Paragraph D, where it is called the Mother Tree Project.
Correct Answer: B
Passage Reference: In the other main form, ectomycorrhizae, the fungus wraps the root in a thick sheath that often makes it several times wider, and its threads pass between root cells without entering them.
Why this is correct: Paragraph B explains this. In ectomycorrhizae, the fungus wraps the root in a thick sheath. This often makes the root several times wider, which means broader.
Tips: Ask what the fungus puts around the root. Then check how much bigger the root becomes.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A lists what the plant gains, such as minerals. It does not describe the shape of the root.
- C: Paragraph C describes threads spreading out from a root tip. It does not say the root grows wider.
- D: Paragraph D is about research on networks. The size of a root is not mentioned there.
- E: Paragraph B gives this detail. The fungal sheath often makes the root several times wider.
Correct Answer: E
Passage Reference: Simard now leads the Mother Tree Project, a 100-year study of different harvesting approaches in the Douglas fir forests of British Columbia's Interior.
Why this is correct: Look at Paragraph D. It names the Mother Tree Project and says Simard leads it. It does not say who pays for the project.
Tips: Knowing who leads a project is not the same as knowing who pays for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Paragraph A explains the basic partnership between roots and fungi. Money is not mentioned.
- B: Paragraph B describes forms of partnership and Canadian forests. There is nothing about paying for research.
- C: Paragraph C names a university and a journal for the 1997 study. Funding for that work is never mentioned.
- D: Paragraph D names the leader of the long project. It gives no source of money for it.